November 06, 2009

Political Correctness kills...

Armed Israeli Defense Force girls

The above picture is one I took on our last year's pilgrimage to the Holy Land. You see young people like this everywhere in Israel. Maybe, just maybe, Israelis know something about dealing with Muslim terrorists. Hmm?

Political Correctness and the Ft. Hood Shooting - Stephanie Gutmann:

...Soldiers in other countries are allowed to carry arms on base and even when they are off-duty. In Israel, for instance, soldiers are issued a rifle and then . . . it's theirs. One sees slender 18-year-old girls, traveling from base, home to the suburbs for Shabbat dinner, still slung with a massive M-16 rifle almost as big as they are. The prevalence of arms doesn't mean the country experiences the kind of random mass murders seen in the United States. It means that the few times someone has gone crazy with a gun in a city street, he was taken down fast by bystanders.

But not American soldiers....

Pacifism, or rather nihilism disguised as fake-pacifism, is one of the sicknesses of our time. No matter how many times it's proved wrong, a large portion of the populace will continue to believe that looking and being weak will make them safer and will prevent violence and war. But pacifism causes war.

Whoever gave the orders that American soldiers should not carry their sidearms or other weapons on our military bases murdered those soldiers who died at Ft Hood. Charlene was an Army brat, and she says that personnel carried their weapons on the base when she was young. Somebody (the phrase "death panel" springs to mind) disarmed the very men and women who are sworn to protect us using violent force when necessary. INSANE! SICK!

And I remember when Reagan became President, one of his first acts was to rescind an order that forbade officers from wearing their uniforms much of the time when working in Washington DC. It's the same sickness.

Bookworm writes, in a good post:

...I've also heard from back channels that people like Hasan have been an ongoing concern within the military. The fear inspired by political correctness, however, has meant that internal enforcement agencies (FBI, military police, etc.) have been afraid to act on their suspicions for fear of being tarred as racists or ideologues. This climate of PC fear must have increased dramatically since Obama's justice department made it plain that it considered those who acted in defense of the U.S. as potential war criminals. In the topsy turvy world of Obama politics, it's a worse sin to be politically incorrect than to be a terrorist. Our national security forces have read the tea leaves and, no matter how patriotic I'm sure they are, they've concluded that the sure risk to their career for being un-PC is greater than the potential risk of a terrorist attack from some psychiatrist or foot soldier somewhere in the South or the Midwest, or wherever else the next Muslim loony-toonz starts making noise on American soil...

Any sane society would have interned Major Hassan. Slapped him into a nice comfy summer-camp as soon as he started talking his Islamist trash-talk. Or at least discharged him! But that would require believing that our country is worth doing tough, even brutal, things for. It is belief that the nihilist fears. Belief in anything that is bigger than the self, anything that demands putting the self second.

What is the common thread among the things that our fake-liberals hate and want to destroy? Christianity and Judaism, America, Israel, family, Western Civ., traditional morality, traditional art and architecture, our military, global responsibility. TRUTH. ALL of them are, on a symbolic level, things that are bigger than the individual, bigger than the supposedly "autonomous" self. Things that demand servanthood, and sacrifice, and devotion.

Posted by John Weidner at November 6, 2009 09:47 AM
Comments

Looks like we all need to start carrying weapons. Next week I am applying for a concealed carry permit. Unfortunately for you, the scrubs that live in your area won't allow it. You still have time to sell out and move old buddy before they turn you in to "solent green".

Posted by: nostromo at November 6, 2009 10:55 AM

They would, you know.

We don't have CCW, but the Weidners are not unarmed, at least at home...

Posted by: John Weidner at November 6, 2009 12:11 PM

I think her recollection must be wrong. All services have kept weapons stored in the armory forever. Even private weapons had to be registered and placed in the armory. The only time I remember anyone being armed is on guard duty and those weapons were secured.
This was a problem at Pearl Harbor...

Posted by: Kevin S at November 6, 2009 06:34 PM

I second Kevin's statement, John. When I was in the Army in '85-'88, ALL rifles, pistols, shotguns, etc., were locked up in the armory at all times, except when they might be needed for guard duty. And God help you if you lost so much as a single round of ammunition.

Political correctness had nothing to do with this. Ninety-nine and 44/100% of it had to do with safety considerations ("You can't replace a soldier's life"), even if it was a bit overboard. The other 56/100% probably was a fetish for property accountability-- not unreasonable when you're dealing with firearms, especially military ones.

Posted by: Hale Adams at November 6, 2009 09:44 PM

I had a friend in the Army around '70, and he told me the same.

But this post by Michael Ledeen suggests things may be changing.

Anyway, it's crazy to keep soldiers disarmed during a fourth-generation war. Or citizens, for that matter.

Posted by: John Weidner at November 6, 2009 10:38 PM

The bases I've been on, only the MPs carry weapons with ammo. Anyone else will draw the weapon before they go to training, not draw ammo until they're actually walking onto a firing line, and then take the weapon back to the armory when training is over. The only exceptions are basic training and AIT, when you live with your weapon for extended periods of time (but only have a blank round or a dummy round, to practice clearing the weapon); and then over here in Iraq. We carry our weapons everywhere. In fact, they won't let you in the chow hall unless you've got it on you...unless you're actually running for PT, you've got your weapon and ammo with you. Honestly? It's a real pain in the ass...but yeah, having more trained people armed makes me MORE comfortable, not less, that's for sure!

Posted by: Ethan Hahn at November 7, 2009 12:14 PM

One one the many things to be learned from the terrible event at Ft. Hood is that the 9mm is a "politically correct" weapon. It took 4 shots to bring down the shooter. Had the shooter been hit with the old "45" auto, he would have dropped like a rock with one shot. Why do you think that the Texas Rangers still consider the .45 automatic their weapon of choice?

Posted by: nostromo at November 9, 2009 06:22 AM
Post a comment









Remember personal info?






Weblog by John Weidner