June 19, 2009
Am I the only one who notices that what we are doing is INSANE?
North Korea has announced that it will shoot a missile in the direction of Hawaii. So what do we do? We take defensive measures! Arrrghhh!
I mean, like, if a 400lb crazy brute is harassing people, you do want to be a wee bit cautious about how you handle the situation. But suppose a two-foot tall midget lunatic is wandering around whacking people with a golf club. And we react...How? By being very careful not to provoke him, and by trying to bribe him not to express his feelings. And by advising people to wear shin-guards, just in case.
And by searching our consciences to find out what we've done to deserve these blows. And by declaring that stopping this pint-sized juggernaut would be un-Chistian. And that even talking about doing so is evidence that one is dangerously bellicose, and not to be trusted.
And then when we learn that he's trying to build a machin e gun, we...do what? Why, redouble our efforts to be pacifistic and non-judgemental.
And if I point out that he has people imprisoned in his basement, and is torturing them and starving them to death.... Why, that means I'm some kind of neo-con imperialist! A bad person, obviously!
Mark Steyn, on the Hugh Hewitt Show...
...HH: Now let me play for you an extraordinary, historic bit of tape, Mark Steyn. Earlier today, Robert Gates, Secretary of Defense:Posted by John Weidner at June 19, 2009 05:03 PM
RG: We do have some concerns of they were to launch a missile to the West in the direction of Hawaii. I've directed the deployment again of THAD missiles to Hawaii, and the SBX radar has deployed away from Hawaii to provide support.
HH: Mark Steyn, he's talking about North Korea shooting missiles in the general direction of Hawaii.
MS: Yeah, and this has been a slow-motion train wreck, I think, for American credibility in the world. Ostensibly, they're not supposed to have the capability to do this. Again, the Washington bigwigs used to mock the rumors that were, going back now to I think 1998-1999. There was a rumor that the North Koreans were planning on firing a nuke at Vancouver or Montreal because it would demonstrate to the Americans that they were serious, but without inviting their own nuclear retaliation. And the State Department mocked it as preposterous. Now flash forward ten years later, and we have the Secretary of Defense of the United States making a serious, sober statement about protecting Hawaii from a nuclear attack by a state that has a lower GDP per capita than Zimbabwe. This is deeply damaging to American credibility in the world today....
You're disregarding Seoul. The DPRK has enough artillery in place to level most if not all of the city in an hour. Most of norther South Korea would be wiped out, even if the war was won. That's not something to treat lightly.
But you're also missing that it's not the DPRK we're placating, but the ChiComs. There's no point in putting pressure on the DPRK as long as the ChiComs back that regime. If we wanted to actually do something useful, we would have to pressure the PRC and we can't do that with the Democratic Party's spending spree going on.
Posted by: Annoying Old Guy at June 19, 2009 06:50 PMI wasn't talking about war. But it would be perfectly reasonable for us to break some windows if any missile is sent in the general direction of US flag territory.
But what's odd and unfortunate is the general perception that the US can't do such things. Other countries get to be "touchy" about certain subjects (say China about Taiwan) and they get a pass when they become belligerant over any encroachment on their particular sticker patch.
We really need to be a bit more up-front crazy, just as a way of keeping the world more peaceful. Bush made a bit of a start, and for a while tyrants trembled and imagined themselves being pulled out of spider holes... and acted a little more reasonable. Too bad it didn't last.
You would have thought Obama would be more concerned, seeing as how he spent so much time in Hawaii as a child and all. I wouldn't be surprised if this wasn't a direct slam at him by Ronery Kim. But I've noticed that our cosmopolitan, world-loving prez doesn't actually seem to really care, to have any kind of home feeling, about the various places he's lived. (Contrast that with Bush, who went to his Texas ranch whenever he could escape DC.)
Posted by: Andrea Harris at June 20, 2009 06:42 AMYeah, where does he go to go "home?" Chicago?
Will they end up in New York, like the Clintons? Will Michelle become a Senator?
Posted by: John Weidner at June 20, 2009 07:16 AMyObmq4 comment5 ,
Posted by: Vlverwjl at June 22, 2009 04:13 PM
