January 28, 2009

I'm proud to say I've never read Updike...

John Updike's Dead: Do We Still Have To Pretend To Like His Books?:

...Updike was a novelist, not an economist. But the politics with which he infected his craft made him a star.

The media loved Updike because Updike was unsparingly critical of the United States. He castigated it for its greed, its stupidity, its xenophobia. He saw Americans as a group of know-nothing conservatives consumed with money-lust and more typical lust. He saw everyday Americans as hypocrites who thumped both Bibles and the minister's wife.

Updike has been hailed as one of the great American writers. When it comes to American writers, no one surpasses Mark Twain. In his famously brilliant essay, "Fenimore Cooper's Literary Offenses," Twain took James Fenimore Cooper, author of "The Last of the Mohicans," to the woodshed. His words fairly describe Updike:
"A work of art? It has no invention; it has no order, system, sequence, or result; it has no lifelikeness, no thrill, no stir, no seeming of reality; its characters are confusedly drawn, and by their acts and words they prove that they are not the sort of people the author claims that they are; its humor is pathetic; its pathos is funny; its conversations are -- oh! indescribable; its love-scenes odious; its English a crime against the language. Counting these out, what is left is Art. I think we must all admit that.

Long before I was even starting to think clearly about such things, I've had an aversion to all those literary globbits that we are required to like. Supposed to like. You know, supposed to like them because our betters who live in New York tell us to. Fatuous people who write for the New York/er/Times/Review of Books.

"He saw Americans as a group of know-nothing conservatives consumed with money-lust and more typical lust. He saw everyday Americans as hypocrites who thumped both Bibles and the minister's wife." And how did he find that out? From other liberals in Manhattan!

I know how this shit works--I live in San Francisco. Everybody can imitate the accent and asininity of a red-neck southern fundamentalist. How? From the movies, or learned from liberal culture. No liberal I've ever heard of would try to actually get to know small-town or conservative Americans. They already know what to think.

Posted by John Weidner at January 28, 2009 12:09 PM
Comments

I have lived in the South all of my life and never have considered myself a "redneck". That's been my problem. Henceforth and forever more, I will be a "redneck" and will wear this moniker with all the independent pride I can muster....
Best wishes to the rest of you,
"Mr. Bubba"

Posted by: ron at January 28, 2009 01:03 PM

Come on, you have to admit that Shakespeare is actually good. Although, of course, it's better when acted competently than read on a page.

Posted by: Annoying Old Guy at January 28, 2009 03:25 PM

I've never read any Updike either. The sexual perambulations of upper middle class WASPs has never been a major interest of mine. I did see the movie version of Witches of Eastwick, because my friend was a Jack Nicholson fan.

Have you read Florence King's takedown of Updike? (Hey, "takedown of Updike" -- that's some sort of... thing.) Anyway, it's hilarious. It's in her collection Reflections in a Jaundiced Eye. You can read an excerpt here.

Posted by: Andrea Harris at January 28, 2009 04:25 PM

Oops -- re that link -- maybe not. But here's a mention of her description of reading Updike: "trying to cut through whale blubber with a pair of embroidery scissors.” Heh.

Posted by: Andrea Harris at January 28, 2009 04:28 PM

I tackled Updike's flatulent prose a time or two, but that was back before I became a "redneck".

Posted by: Mr. Bubba at January 28, 2009 07:07 PM

AOG--Certainly. I'm not sure why the question. If it's because he's liked by the Manhattan literary crowd, well, I don't think he is. They can't ever admit it, but I'd guess that secretly most of them would prefer someone who has a better understanding of the utter horror of middle-class America...

Posted by: John Weidner at January 28, 2009 10:17 PM

It's in reference to

I've had an aversion to all those literary globbits that we are required to like
, Shakespeare being one of those globbits. On the other hand, I can't actually think of any other member of that set that I like despite the requirement...

Posted by: Annoying Old Guy at January 29, 2009 02:32 PM

I wasn't clear.

I meant required in the sense of "this is this week's best-seller and everyone is talking about it." I never felt like "everyone," even though I used to own a bookstore...

Posted by: John Weidner at January 29, 2009 05:26 PM
Post a comment









Remember personal info?






Weblog by John Weidner