August 24, 2008
Sacrifices...
David Harsanyi writes:
Biden on Haditha
In June 2006, straight-talking Joe Biden went on Meet the Press and demanded accountability from the administration for the so-called Haditha massacre. Biden spoke about the incident as if the accused marines were guilty (before a trial) and called on the administration to proceed — and to be treated — as if there were a cover-up at the highest levels of government.
Well, it turned out Biden was wrong about Haditha. Eight of the Marines charged for the “massacre” and “coverup” have already been exonerated. (One case is still pending.)...
[Thanks to Glenn R]
He writes that Biden ought to admit he was wrong and apologize, especially since Biden demanded apologies and admissions of mistakes from the administration. In fact demanded that the Secretary of Defense should be fired immediately!
I completely agree with Harsanyi, but I don't think that's what's most important here.
There are claims made on us by things that are higher and more important than our selves. Of course the highest is our duty to God. But there are also claims on a lower level that work in an analogous way, and are mysteriously tied to each other. One of these is the duty we owe to our country. Especially in a case where ones country is not just a nation or a volk or race, but is based, like the United States, on ideas handed down from our forefathers.
And the claims of our country are strongest in time of war. We have then, all of us, an especial duty to put our selfish interests second to the needs of our land. This will involve for some people putting their lives at risk. Others owe different sacrifices. Politicians have a duty to put their political advantage second to the needs of war. (No, I'm not saying they can't criticize, but any criticism must be constructive, and done with the utmost care.)
This is a duty. There is no evading it.
An example of this is our four great wars of the Twentieth Century. All of these were Democrat wars. Democrat presidents led us into WWI, WWII, Korea and Vietnam. And in each of these wars the Republican Party was a loyal opposition, and gave up many opportunities to criticize. No Republican stood up in the Senate and pointed out that Belleau Wood or Iwo Jima or Slapton Sands or LZ Bitch were blunders that threw away lives needlessly. No Republican demanded that Stimson be fired for the Battle of the Bulge. Why not? Because it would have undermined the war effort and the confidence of our troops.
When Joe Biden condemned the Haditha marines, declared them guilty before the incident had even been investigated, he violated this solemn rule. In fact what he did was to commit treason, just as much as if he had given secrets to the enemy. He voted to send those men into battle in the Iraq Campaign, and then he betrayed them. He sent American men and women to risk death in war, and then he turned around and spit on them.
This is close-to-certain evidence that he is a nihilist. That he puts nothing higher than himself. Why do I say that? Because the claims of higher things are tied to each other. Each one teaches us about the others. I put my children's welfare higher than my own, and this is a very easy thing for a parent to do. But that duty teaches me a lot about how to undertake other solemn duties. (As a Catholic I would say that these things are somehow linked sacramentally. The small things touch on the greater things, and vice versa, in ways that are supernatural and mysterious.)
Mr Biden's casual flouting of a solemn duty is strong evidence that he acknowledges no higher duties of any sort. Of course I could be wrong about this, but I would be surprised to learn that he has some philosophy or cause or set of deep principles that he holds sacred, that he would sacrifice his own interests for. And I think that what he is says a lot about the party and the type of people who have put him forth as a possible Vice-President.
Posted by John Weidner at August 24, 2008 09:02 AMHere, here! Well said Citizen!
Posted by: pBeez at August 24, 2008 03:47 PMThe Democratic criticism of the war has always amazed me. There were so many ways they could have argued against it, yet still retain the impression that they wanted to win it (or at least end it in a way that did not look like a rout to the rest of the world).
They could have focused on shortcoming in supplying the troops, in their medical care afterwards, in the tactics used, in the failures by the intelligence community.
Instead, after voting to start the war, they turned around and did everything they could to trash the war effort. They gave their support when it was politically feasible, then pulled it back when it was feasible.
The sheer, bald-faced opportunism by the Democratic Party is breath-taking, and morally indefensible.
Posted by: Lou Shoemaker at August 24, 2008 03:56 PMOutstanding post. I agree with every word!
Biden and fellow Democrats paint themselves into this amoral and treasonous corner by their very refusal to acknowledge things higher than themselves. They have no morality and no humility. Their dogma and policies are a direct result, and yes, it is nihilism. Thank you for putting this so succinctly and yet eloquently.
Posted by: Peg C. at August 24, 2008 04:05 PMYour thoughts should be front and center in McCain's acceptance speech, and every speech he makes through is campaign.
However, belief in something greater than one's own agenda or power or even self, is being nudged out of the way evermore boldly.
What's taking its place is the notion that the person--and the personal--is enough, and whatever it takes is whatever it must take.
Excellent post. My feeling has always been that most of today's Democrat politicians have no higher interest than "themselves" and political power.
Posted by: John at August 24, 2008 04:26 PMOn the other hand he could be just another irredeemable A**hole.
Posted by: bc at August 24, 2008 04:27 PMWow! Nothing at all 'random' about that jotting, but as 'to the point' as anything I've read recently.
Since it's logic and reason is unassailable, I'd expect Democrats to ignore it. One hopes John McCain will not.
Thanks, all! The encouragement is much appreciated. --John W.
Posted by: John Weidner at August 24, 2008 05:20 PMAll this has been said over the last seven years, but seldom as well, and not, I think, with Biden on the hook.
People always come up with justifications of their actions, of course, even if they are threadbare. We do this not only to keep others from accusing us, but to keep our own conscience from accusing us. With growing self-righteousness over the years, the Democrats have rationalised this dereliction of duty by two weak excuses.
First, they falsely appeal to a higher duty. If America were doing wrong, it would indeed be their duty to point it out. It does not follow that because they are accusing, therefore America is doing wrong. That they are entitled to make accusations does not prove that making accusations is a good thing.
Second, and related, is the claim that dissent is in itself a noble act, and even "the highest form of patriotism." This is absurd. It is America's tolerance of dissent that makes her free. People dissent in even totalitarian countries, but they have to do so under their breath or publish abroad. Dissent itself is not moral. It is the logical equivalent of claiming that because people are innocent until proven guilty, therefore acting suspicious is the highest form of lawfulness.
Hey, I like that. I'm definitely going to post that last bit on my own site. Thanks for the inspiration.
Posted by: Assistant Village Idiot at August 24, 2008 05:36 PMPrincipled criticism is necessary for a free society to function and advance.
Politicizing a war while our people are in harm's way is evil. As Lou says above, there are so many other ways they could have argued against the war that wouldn't have served to boost the enemy's morale.
I was raised a Southern Democrat. I've always voted Republican for president, but often Dem for state and local.
In 2006 I decided I wouldn't vote for any Dem for any office for the foreseeable future, for the reason you lay out so well here.
McCain wasn't my first choice as nominee, but, back when most of the senate was losing faith, he said he'd rather win a war than an election. I'll never forget that.
Posted by: stace at August 24, 2008 06:21 PMI haven't heard it put more eloquently, that higher duties and obligations are linked and touch upon the lower. That's just fantastic. As a Catholic Convert, I started by realizing that my protestant church could not simultaneously defend the helpless and stand up for abortion. From there, I realized that the phrase, "Culture of Life" has a much more expansive meaning. Much of what is believed by the Left is driven by this culture of death; that is a reduction in life and the dignity of life. Abortion and euthanasia are simple to see. Environmentalism, in it's unadulterated form claims that we, the living, are the problem. The animal rights movement seeks not to elevate animals so much as to eliminate the special status of people. The government welfare beloved by so many "social justice" Christians is a complete perversion of Christian charity. It uses the threat of violence to take from one, extract a living from this, give to the other. There is no gratitude, no examination of conscience or behavior on the part of the recipient, and no feeling of a deed well done on the part of the giver. I can think of little on the left that is not somehow tied to this degredation or open destruction of human beings.
Posted by: J Berger at August 24, 2008 07:01 PMI think the subject of "the Left" or liberalism is a very confusing one, because the left has changed.
All such ideologies started out as perversions of Christian and Jewish faith, by people who still had many of the habits of faith. So they invented new holy books and prophets, and often served their "truths" with saint-like self-sacrifice. They worshipped something that seemed at least to be higher than themselves.
But over the generations the habits faded, and most leftists now are just wearing their politics as a sort of disguise, to cover up the emptiness and self-worship inside them. (I've wrote a lot about this; click on "nihilism" in the category list on the sidebar.)
But guys like Obama or Biden are just assumed to be like the dedicated liberals of old, and millions will vote for him because they assume they are doing something for the poor, etc. They get a free pass.
The culture of death is just the result of worshipping the self. Others are expendable if they are an obstacle to whatever the self wants. (I can understand this perfectly well; in my selfish sinful moments I think the same way.)
There is a reason the commands of God begin with, "I Am the Lord your God" and end with, "You shall not covet anything that is your neighbor's." It's like a top-down - or God's-eye - view of the metaphorical Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil: The final rotten fruit of all sin is godlessness, and the root of all sin is covetousness.
Covetousness is a multi-faceted phenomenon, so it can be viewed through any one of several prisms: Covetousness, envy, jealousy, lust, selfishness, or greed. It boils down to an unholy desire for anything God blessed another with, and that the sinner has no legitimate right to, and so covetousness in all of its forms leads to every other sin that there is: Adulteries, thefts, murders, &c.
The modern left, it seems to me, has become The Party of Covetousness, though to be sure there are plenty of Republicans caught up in that death-spiral as well, unfortunately. Leftists lust for nothing more than power, with money a close second - you might even call money the ultimate fringe benefit of the power they whore after - and they are envious to the point of violence in some cases of right thinking people's freedom to dissent, disagree, and oppose them.
Their lust for power, greed for money, and jealousy of their opposition's freedom is what leads to their treacherous and treasonous acting out, and so they are often reduced to being utterly and completely irrational and nihilistic in their thoughts, words, and deeds.
If you know what to look for, the signs of their spiritual sickness are literally written on their faces, from Nancy Pelosi's 250 BPM eye-blinking to Biden's ill-timed and inappropriate auto-reflexive smiles. In between are Al Gore's condescending tones - in every speech he makes he sounds like a hectoring kindergarten teacher addressing a class of unruly children - and Charles Schumer's slimy and intolerable superiority complex.
I have no proposed solution for the godless madness and spiritual desolation of the contemporary left, I only know that I will continue to oppose them, and I will not let them intimidate me into doing otherwise.
The only glimmer of hope I have to offer is that I too used to be a leftist.
Posted by: Hucbald at August 25, 2008 04:24 AMInteresting thoughts, Hucbald.
I—sometimes—think that the calamitous nature of our times conceals a benefit. That is, that the lines are finally clearly drawn. The fight will be open. (Related link)
Posted by: John Weidner at August 25, 2008 09:43 AMOnly Murtha makes Biden seem even tolerable. Not a good standard...
Posted by: anon at August 25, 2008 11:25 AM
