January 15, 2008
Perception differs from reality....
Never fails. Just when I've decided to give the orders to have the entire management of the NYT shipped off for a little vacation..."To Guantanamo Bay, Where the flying fishes play, Towsay Mongalay, my dear, Towsey Mongalay..." then they go and print something decent.
I recommend Driving Mr. Romney, by Dean Barnett. (Besides being a writer and blogger, Dean was a volunteer driver for Mitt during his senate race...)
....As a longtime admirer of Mr. Romney’s, it pains me that many Americans believe these things. Even worse, Mr. Romney’s presidential campaign has given them cause to feel this way. As a result, in the Michigan primary today, he is fighting for his political life.Posted by John Weidner at January 15, 2008 12:32 PM
I often marvel at how the public perception of Mr. Romney differs so radically from the man I know. The blame for this lies in the campaign he has run.
Early in the presidential race, Mr. Romney perceived a tactical advantage in becoming the campaign’s social conservative. Religious conservatives and other Republicans with socially conservative views found the two early front-runners, John McCain and Rudy Giuliani, unacceptable. As someone who shares the beliefs of social conservatives, Mr. Romney saw an opportunity that he could exploit. He made social issues the heart of his candidacy.
This tack rang false with the public because it was false. The problem wasn’t so much the perception of widespread “flip-flopping” on issues like abortion. The public allows its politicians a measure of flexibility. But the public correctly sensed something disingenuous about Mr. Romney’s campaign.
Voters perceived the cynicism of a campaign that tried to exploit wedge issues rather than focus on the issues that in truth most interested the candidate. They sensed phoniness. As a consequence, many have grown to feel that Mitt Romney can’t be trusted. This lack of trust is now the dominant and perhaps insurmountable obstacle that the Romney campaign faces.....
...Mr. Romney cares passionately about social issues, but he knows his Republican competitors can appoint strict constructionist judges as well as he can. The real value of a Romney presidency would lie in the talents, honed in the business world, that he would bring to the White House.
Because Mr. Romney chose to make this argument a secondary matter compared to his stands on social issues, he mounted a campaign that was, at its most basic level, insincere. Now, parts of the voting public have come to view everything Mr. Romney says through jaundiced eyes....
Why did you leave out a paragraph that was right in the middle. If the NYT did this I/you would be accusing them of distorting the news.
I know few voters will believe this, but Mitt Romney wants to be president out of a sense of duty. He feels our government needs someone with his managerial skills. He also feels that to fight the long war facing us, we need an intellectually curious president who’s willing to learn about an unfamiliar foe and who will fight resolutely to defeat that foe.
Posted by: DaveUSA at January 15, 2008 04:30 PMWell, it was mostly an accident. I was copying this and that, and then changing my mind, and it just ended up that way.
But it is hardly distorting the news, since the ellipses show that something's missing, and you can follow the link and read the whole article.
And, unlike the NYT, I'm not pretending to be a source for the "news." These are just odds and ends that strike my fancy, and might prove to be thought-provoking...
Posted by: John Weidner at January 15, 2008 05:00 PMNo doubt Mitt Romney is a good man, better than many believe him to be.
BUT.... is it too much to ask that We the People not be "managed" so much? That maybe the cure for incompetence in Washington is not better management of what Washington tries to do, but instead is getting Washington to NOT try to do so much? To concentrate on doing well those things that a government should properly be doing?
They're political Taylorists, all of them. At least Thompson is making some of the right noises.....
grumblegrumblegrumble
Posted by: Hale Adams at January 15, 2008 08:51 PMSorry, that's not on the menu.
You are completely right, but government never shrinks. Thompson may make the good noises, but as president he would get ground up by the system like all the others.
Well, actually we've had a few shrinky happenings like transportation deregulation and base closures. But for the most part our only escape is not shrinking government but in putting more of the decision-making power in the hands of citizens. What's sometimes called the Ownership Society...
And shrinking the military somehow has a way of always being a possibility. It's always on the menu. I can't imagine why.
Posted by: John Weidner at January 15, 2008 10:29 PM
