July 26, 2007

The 'Baghdad Diarist'?

Dean Barnett writes about how The New Republic's "Scott Thomas" has now revealed himself. Fascinating stuff. For one thing, he publishes a letter about himself in TNR, without a single answer to the specific criticisms that have been made!

That is like all the pro vs anti-war arguments of the last 6 years in a nutshell.

Also, the guy had a blog! Fool.

Also, Hugh notes that apparently TNR has a blog (who knew? Who cared?) and none of the "journalists" who post there are even mentioning the controversy! Ha ha ha.

There's lots more at Michell Malkin.

* Update: When I started blogging, way back in 2001, I imagined that I was participating (in a very minor way) in a great debate. A debate between Left and Right, between pro and anti-war, between conservative and liberal. But it never happened! Debating leftists is like punching Jello. I thought there were two competing philosophies, but the big discovery I made is that there's nothing inside leftists. No core beliefs or ideas. Like Joyce Little put it, they are clothes with no emperor inside.

I predict that this "Scott Thomas" matter will never be cleanly resolved, that it will just fizzle out in vagueness and frustration, exactly like John Kerry's despicable Vietnam accusations. Defenders of our country and our military will continue to make factual and philosophical arguments, but it will be like trying to beat up a blob of Jello.

Posted by John Weidner at July 26, 2007 07:36 AM
Comments

I was re-reading some emails I'd exchanged with a friend about a year ago, and I remember the frustration...he'd talk about Bush's mistakes, and I argued that yes, he's made mistakes, but that the list of presidents who have made mistakes in war begins with Washington and Madison, runs through Polk and Lincoln and McKinley, up through Wilson and FDR and Truman (ach, Truman) and Kennedy and Johnson and Nixon, up to Reagan and Clinton and yes, Bush Jr. And pointed out that the fact that there have been mistakes in execution doesn't negate the wisdom of the policy - that what great leaders share is wise policy, doggedly pursued.

And he comes back with a list of predictions that seemed to have been false, and errors of judgement, and bad decisions...

What the fuck can you do? I love the guy, so I kept it polite and kept reminding him of the big picture, which he had failed utterly to comment on...but good Lord, John, you are so right...the first time, you chalk it up as an aberration...but after a while, after every argument becomes a litany of nit picks and bitching and snide comments backed up by NO coherent alternative policy, and every judgment betrays an utter ignorance of history - after a while, the conclusion seems inescapable...

Posted by: Ethan Hahn at July 26, 2007 09:14 AM

Yes. Exactly.

And gradually, chewing on this since 9/11, the world has come to resemble to me some sort of SF story, with ordinary people being taken over by aliens while looking the same on the outside. Or not even aliens, but some oozing fluid of "anti-matter" that seeps into people and hollows them out, leaving the outward form....

And I feel like the guy in the story who runs around trying to warn people, and is considered crazy.

Posted by: John Weidner at July 26, 2007 09:55 AM

Plato knew about nailing jello
(from Theaetetus):

For, in accordance with their text-books, they are always in motion; but as for dwelling upon an argument or a question, and quietly asking and answering in turn, they can no more do so than they can fly; or rather, the determination of these fellows not to have a particle of rest in them is more than the utmost powers of negation can express. If you ask any of them a question, he will produce, as from a
quiver, sayings brief and dark, and shoot them at you; and if you inquire the reason of what he has said, you will be hit by some other new-fangled word, and will make no way with any of them, nor they with one another; their great care is, not to allow of any settled principle either in their arguments or in their minds, conceiving, as I imagine, that any such principle would be stationary; for they are at war with the stationary, and do what they can to drive it out everywhere.

Posted by: anon in tx at July 27, 2007 07:11 PM

Ooooh, that's good! Thanks.

Posted by: John Weidner at July 27, 2007 07:53 PM
Weblog by John Weidner