May 26, 2007
War-dances, and similar...
One of my children asked: What's with "renewing marriage vows?" Don't people know how to keep a contract? I don't renew my library card unless it's expired...
I replied:
You are not using the right tools to analyze this stuff. The analogy is not to renewing a library card. The analogy is to Injuns war-dancing around the campfire before going into battle.
Why do such an illogical thing? Because on some deep level humans respond to ceremonies and rituals. And to a thousand other non-rational clues. For instance, young people often respond to the ceremonial of a high school graduation by taking on a new level of maturity. And their families respond by looking at them somewhat differently, and expecting more from them. None of this can be quantified or "proven," but it seems to be true.
The trouble for conservatives like me is that our belief that things like old ceremonies are valuable can't be demonstrated, so it is hard to defend such things in the "culture wars." For instance, people are forever inventing new ways to get married, such as underwater with scuba gear, or by fudging up a hippie "new age" marriage ceremony. I think these are REALLY bad ideas, that harm all of us, but I can't easily point to any specific harm done.
Actually it is very easy to forget marriage vows in the rush of events, like raising children, and so reminders are a good thing for anyone. You and I would both tend to avoid hokey ceremonies, but it might be better to endure them if it would do us or our spouses good.
(Being a Catholic is VERY good discipline for people in this regard, by the way, because it gives one daily practice in remembering what's really important in the midst of life's distractions. Often by means of ceremonies, ancient texts, smells, sights, postures, beads, music, etc. Crazy, like a war-dance, but it works. And doing it repeatedly works--we are our habits.)
My theory, by the way, is that a lot of the deconstruction of traditional ways that we see is, mostly unconsciously, socialism. That is, people want to destroy the old ties of families, clubs, churches, private schools, because what they really want is to atomize people, and have everyone dependent ONLY on the state.
I should explain again, though I'm probably wasting electrons, that I value things like ancient ceremonies NOT because I'm someone who wants to "turn back the clock," but because I think we are all being hurled at hideous speed into change and into the future, and we need these things as tools in our toolboxes precisely for coping with the new and the unexpected.
Imagine that someone grabs you and stuffs you into a time machine, and sends you 100 years into the future. There is no way to prepare for the specific things you will encounter. (And it is certain that they will be bewildering and frightening.) But you can be philosophically prepared by being grounded in universal truths and in authoritative traditions...
Posted by John Weidner at May 26, 2007 11:58 AMIs renewing wedding vows some sort of ancient ceremony? I thought it was a trendy thing aging yuppies started to do in the 80s when they passed that invisible "divorce or stay together" threshold.
Posted by: Andrea Harris at May 26, 2007 07:12 PMwe are our habits
I do believe that theory follows practice, in pretty much everything, profound and mundane...if you treat the Eucharist as "my Lord and my God," belief in transubstantiation will follow...if you treat your spouse with kindness, even when you're not feeling very kind, then the feelings will follow...if you act happy, you'll become happy...Aristotle told us that to hang out with virtuous people - precisely because by emulating their actions, we'll learn their virtues. But it takes practice...
It's part of why one should go to confession, even if he isn't feeling terribly sorry for his sins...that strikes today's thinking as somehow fake or insincere, when it's exactly the opposite - it's reason, asserting its control over flighty emotion, practicing repentence, learning how to self-correct, how to humble itself before God...
Posted by: Ethan Hahn at May 26, 2007 08:42 PMAndrea, I'm sure you are right, that it isn't ancient. (This was a hasty post from a hasty e-mail, not very consistent.) But it still has the "teaching" effect of ceremonies, though you or I would probably react more positively to something more mossy...
Not related, but this was an interesting post I just read on people takng wedding vows in an appealing way...
Okay, I had wondered if there was something about Catholic life I missed. There's a lot of Catholics in Miami, but the only people I ever heard of who did that "renew marriage vows" thing were older Protestants (if they were any religion at all). At least when I was growing up.
Posted by: Andrea Harris at May 27, 2007 05:47 AMAnd having just read the post you linked to, I think those can be more readily described as first marriages, not second (as those people weren't married in the first place, at least not in the eyes of the church).
Posted by: Andrea Harris at May 27, 2007 05:51 AMNow I've muddled things up. I didn't mean that the link was about renewing; it was just an interesting thing I was reading.
Catholics do renew wedding vows, but it's entirely possible that this is just a recent borrowing from Protestants—If we sing hymns by Wesley, we might have borrowed other things.
It doesn't seem to be in the Catholic Encyclopedia...
