April 11, 2007
This is murder, just as much as if you used a gun...
To block reform of the shockingly bad schools in many inner-city urban areas is to destroy children. Sometimes literally. And in the sense of destroyed lives, by the tens-of-thousands, at the least.
This is murder. Remember this, when Democrat politicians and fake-pacifists shed fake tears over our honorable war dead, and claim the loss of lives in defense of freedom is "unacceptable." The blood of our children is dripping from their hands...
....If the recent budget battle in Albany in which the teachers union and its allied lawmakers killed a proposed tax deduction for private or parochial school tuition and imposed mandatory unionization on charter schools that grow larger than 250 students in the first two years wasn't enough for you, consider California. There, the Los Angeles Times reports, the school board rejected an application by a charter school operator, Green Dot, to open eight new schools. The Times quoted a school board member who represents Watts, a poor Los Angeles neighborhood, Mike Lansing, as saying, "It's really disappointing that we keep talking about wanting to do what's best for children first, when without a doubt that vote was about a teachers union and three board members not having the backbone to stand up and do the right thing for kids over their ties to the union." The Times account of the school board meeting goes on to say, "Parents and students from the impoverished, gang-ridden community also implored the board to approve the charters, saying they were desperate for an alternative to the low-performing, often unsafe district middle and high schools in the area."
The blogger Mickey Kaus wrote, "If teachers' unions have lost the liberal LAT, they're in trouble, no?" Not in so much trouble that they lost the vote. Lance Izumi of the free-market Pacific Research Institute summed it up: "Despite Green Dot's promising results, the school board decided to side with the United Teachers of Los Angeles, a vociferous critic of charter schools…The union had contributed a total of $1 million to two anti-Green Dot board members in their recent re-election bids, virtually the entirety of their campaign war chests." The irony is that charter schools were championed by the late president of the American Federation of Teachers, Albert Shanker, who saw them as a way to improve public education while avoiding private school vouchers. What would Shanker think of the AFT affiliates in New York and Los Angeles blocking the expansion of successful charter programs in both New York (with a cap on the number of new charters, notwithstanding that two of the charters were granted to the union itself ) and in the nation's second largest city, Los Angeles?....[From the NY Sun. Thanks to Orrin. Emphasis mine.].
Every Democrat politician benefits from the enormous contributions of the corrupt "teachers" unions (which are in fact the unions of vast educational bureaucracies in which the concerns of teachers count for little). Every Democrat politician takes this blood money, and everyone who votes Democrat is complicit in murder.
Posted by John Weidner at April 11, 2007 07:09 AMJohn,
I find the teachers' unions every bit as despicable as you do.
However...
Words have meanings. The kids in New York State and in LA are not being murdered. Badly educated, or suffering criminal neglect at the hands of officialdom, yes. Murdered, no.
The best part is that once they do get a proper education (if only to a high-school level as you and I understand the term), they will understand just how badly the "system" screwed them, and the teachers' unions and their allies will find they've only managed to slit their own throats.
Too bad we all have to wait a generation for them to "bleed out", and to have all those children suffer in the meantime.
Posted by: Hale Adams at April 11, 2007 06:05 PMWell, it's not technically murder, but people often use the word for situations where they think that someone is contributing to things that have fatal results.
And the results here are often fatal, in various ways.
Will they "understand?" I doubt it. Polls currently show that 60% of urban blacks support school vouchers. Yet they still vote Democrat like robots.
Republican politicians, by the way, are only marginally better on this issue. They don't expect votes from the inner city, and too many suburbanites like their schools and have no desire to see kids from other districts horning in....
Posted by: John Weidner at April 11, 2007 07:44 PMI'm a little late to the party here, but I've gotta agree with Hale - I think using the term murder is overstating the case - I mean, it may be criminal negligence, as Hale said, but murder implies intent to kill, and I'd rather reserve that term for cases where that is an accurate description.
Well, I can't argue with your logic. But when I see poor and minority children screwed over by the party that claims to be for children, minorities and the poor....hyperbole seems like understatement.
Posted by: John Weidner at April 14, 2007 02:41 PM
