December 05, 2006

This is what our Leftists support...

J Post: A hitherto unknown group calling itself the Just Swords of Islam issued a warning to Palestinian women in the Gaza Strip over the weekend that they must wear the hijab or face being targeted by the group's members.

In pamphlets distributed in various parts of the Gaza Strip, the group also claimed responsibility for attacks on 12 Internet cafes over the past few days.

The warning was directed primarily against female students in a number of universities and colleges who do not cover their heads in line with Islamic tradition.

The group said its followers last week threw acid at the face of a young woman who was dressed "immodestly" in the center of Gaza City. They also destroyed a car belonging to a young man who was playing his radio tape too loudly.

Addressing female students, the group said: "We will have no mercy on any woman who violates the traditions of Islam and who also hang out in Internet cafes." (Thanks to Tim Blair)

When you see our lefty lack-wits wearing kaffiyas, this is where the path they are on is headed. They won't admit it to themselves, but it's true. They have had ten thousand opportunities to choose between Palestinian thuggery and Israeli openness and tolerance and democracy. And they always go with the worst. They always go for anti-Semitism. It's no accident, and they aren't going to change now. (Here's a good link)

And we won't see any of our professional "feminists," or "human rights" organizations denouncing this stuff. (It's not just mental rigidity. If you are a card-carrying "feminist," there's a lot of loot involved. Organizations and politicians usually show that they care about women not by caring about women, but by hiring a certified "feminist." If you say nice things about Israel or criticize Palestinian murderers you will be tossed off the gravy train.)

Leftists are not going to turn aside from their path, because they have no brakes. There's no institution, no built-in safety mechanism that can call a halt. Newman noted this 150 years ago, in battling against liberal religion. No brakes. It's the same with "liberalism" [in its modern, not classical sense] in general. And libertarianism. (And we sure see Newman vindicated now, looking at today's Anglican gay/female/divorced bishops. A Moslem is next, I bet you.)

Posted by John Weidner at December 5, 2006 10:31 AM
Comments

John writes:

".... No brakes. It's the same with "liberalism" in general. And libertarianism....."

Whew, John. You're just full of...um, energy.... today, aren't you?

I'm second to no one in my dislike of the closeted totalitarians who go by the tag "liberals" nowadays. But I think you're painting with waaaaaay too broad a brush here. It was liberalism (or, in modern terms, libertarianism-- the totalitarians have soiled the old word) that brought us things like Catholic Emancipation (in Britain), free trade, universal manhood sufferage, and female emancipation (and sufferage, too), etc., etc.

I realize that you have to use some word to label the Teddy Kennedys (and worse) of this world with, but "libertarianism" (19th Century liberalism, if you will) ain't one of them.

Aside from stepping on my toes really hard (and causing me to bellow-- I've been on my feet all day and they hurt), you're on target as usual. :)

Posted by: Hale Adams at December 5, 2006 04:14 PM

I goofed; I will add a correction. I do not, of course, mean Classical Liberalism. And of course the confusion is no accident. I believe it arose when reporters asked the New Dealers if they were socialists—which they were—and they said no, they were "liberals." Nowadays the same sort is asked if they are liberals (meaning socialists) and they say no, we're "Progressives."

Energy? Well, I shoot all that sort of energy into the morning's blogpost, and then proceed through the rest of the day with a transcendental calm that would put the Buddha to shame. ;-)

Feel free to tell me when I've gone over-the-top...

Posted by: John Weidner at December 5, 2006 04:54 PM

No problem, John. :) There's an old saying (from Mark Twain?) about how "if one wants to be sure of encountering nothing more unpleasant in the course of a day, swallow a toad first thing in the morning". I think your post is something like that, only in reverse-- getting rid of "bad juju" first thing, and be calm the rest of the day. :)

As for socialists styling themselves "progressives" nowadays, they're just re-using an old label. It was Taylor's ideas of industrial organization (which I've ranted here about before) that, after 1900 or so, infused socialism with pseudo-scientific rigor, and allowed socialists to portray themselves as the wave of the future, or "progressive".

Posted by: Hale Adams at December 5, 2006 07:28 PM

Peel the onion down a few layers, and the tears are the same...

Posted by: John Weidner at December 5, 2006 10:06 PM
Weblog by John Weidner