June 29, 2006
This guy is evil...
This is the sick-o billionaire who's bankrolling the Democrats (you know, that party of the little people, against the powerful):
...NEWSWEEK: You say that the main obstacle to a stable and just world is the United States. That's a pretty strong statement.
George Soros: Yes, but it happens to coincide with the prevailing opinion in the [leftist anti-democratic elite] world. And I think that's rather shocking for Americans to hear. [Nah. Not shocking. I've been hearing it all my life from you Bolshies] The United States sets the agenda for the world. And the rest of the world has to respond to that agenda. By declaring a "war on terror" after September the 11th, we set the wrong agenda for the world. [And the right agenda is? Appeasement? Hugs and kisses?] This is something that people in America find difficult to understand because war seems like the natural response. [It IS the natural response. Of human beings against atheist anti-humans. Like you. That's the real war, of which the WOT is a small campaign.]
NEWSWEEK: Why is a "war on terror" the wrong response to the attacks on the United States?
First of all because when you wage war, you inevitably create innocent victims. [Whereas appeasing terrorists harms not a hair on an innocent head---they saw them off with great care.] When you wage war on terrorists who don't announce their whereabouts, the danger of hitting the innocent people is even greater. [notice the leftist worldview--only America DOES things. The world is a stage where no one moves or breathes until the protagonist walks on.] We abhor terrorists, because they kill innocent people for political goals. But by waging war on terror we are doing the same thing. [We abhor germs because they kill cells. BUT (always the "but") by using Penicillin WE do the same.]
And the people who are on the receiving end see us in the same light with the same negative attitude as we have towards terrorists. [Right. That's why millions of refugees have RETURNED to Iraq and Afghanistan.] It's also a threat to our democracy. Because when you wage war, the president can appropriate for himself excessive powers. [Like those notorious tyrants Lincoln, Wilson and FDR] He can call anyone who criticizes his policies unpatriotic. That undermines the critical process of an open society and that is how we made this tremendous blunder of invading Iraq... [The critical processes are debate and elections. Soros & Co made the Tranzi anti-patriotic case. Their position was perfectly clear, and it was defeated decisively in... debate and elections.]
The guy is evil.
Posted by John Weidner at June 29, 2006 08:23 AMWell, if Mr Soreass thinks that we can negociate with the terrorists, why don't he send his own chicken-shit ass over there and negociate with them (This will be like Adolph Hitler negociating in Hell). Then after they torture him (he will find out what real torture truly is), beat him, hack his head off & mutalate his body, he can let us know how it went (oh..wait...he can't he will be DEAD).
Posted by: John Lanning at July 1, 2006 02:28 AMThe simpleton John Weidner illustrates above the inanity of you Americans who remain in furious denial over the ugly role your discredited nation has taken on. Soros represents mainstream global opinion. There's a reason people have the view they do of America.
Go on, keep bankrupting yourselves on a "war" economy, keep alienating your onetime allies, keep torturing, abducting, building your gulag of prisons. Keep calling everyone who opposes this a "leftist."
It might convince you. It convinces no one else.
Soros represents the same blind world view that Europe had during the 1930's, you know, the Hitler is harmless attitude that changed abruptly on 1 Sept 1939. They are also the same people who have corrupted the UN for the past 50 years to the point that the UN protects warlords and criminals. And while you base your "gulag" stories on lies and assumptions (other than stories comming from terrorists, not one reporter or investigator has found any proof of torture at Gitmo, and the EU has released a report stating that these Phantom European prisons do not exist) you treat people who decapitate and maim unarmed civilians and bomb crowded markets as if they were performing the greater good (I know that a lot of people are concerned about Global Warming and overpopulation, but is this the way to do it?).
And this "war" ecomony, where is it? I do not see any War Bonds being sold, Victory Gardens, food or fuel rationing, hell, there isn't even a draft. I see the same economy that has been running since even before 911. It may be different in France (every year, it seems that the French Government pisses some group off like Islamic activists, lazy people that like being guaranteed thier job reguardless of job performance, garbage collectors, truck drivers, etc.) and turn some French cities, including Paris, into hellish versions of Bastile Day.
