June 02, 2006

Let's see, there's Shakespeare, Plato, Chaucer, Aquinas...and Maya Angelou.

Betsy Newmark quotes from a Seattle School district "definition" of racism (since taken down from their web site, and replaced by more subtle racism)...

Cultural Racism:
Those aspects of society that overtly and covertly attribute value and normality to white people and Whiteness, and devalue, stereotype, and label people of color as “other”, different, less than, or render them invisible. Examples of these norms include defining white skin tones as nude or flesh colored, having a future time orientation, emphasizing individualism as opposed to a more collective ideology, defining one form of English as standard, and identifying only Whites as great writers or composers...

There are so many things wrong (and racist) about this that it would be beating on the obvious to point them out. (Andrew will miss the points, but the rest of you won't.) But it is especially fascinating to me as an example, more glaring than the many others we see every day, of the way leftists try to pretend we are still in their glory days of the Civil Rights Era and Vietnam Era. We're forever stuck on Selma, even it that requires re-defining racism as "having a future time orientation."

And it's also an good example of the fantasy, indulged in since the time of Karl Marx, that various poor or disadvantaged or folksy groups would prefer a "collective ideology" over individualism. It's been WRONG EVERY TIME, but that doesn't keep the fantasy from popping up again. It was wrong for European workers, Latin American peasants, Appalachian coal miners, migrant farm workers...

Also, when you are told that the Left has a Jesus-like concern for the poor, remember that there's a teensy little difference. Jesus wasn't hoping the poor would stay poor (and Democrat, and "collective," and without that horrid "future time orientation").

Posted by John Weidner at June 2, 2006 08:01 AM
Comments

OK - not trying to make a point here, I really don't know. What does "having a future time orientation" mean?

Posted by: Mike Plaiss at June 2, 2006 09:21 AM

You know, all those cold-hearted beady-eyed worry-wart unfair-advantage-giving "white" things. Like, oh, investing, bill-paying, scheduled oil changes and tire rotations, doing your homework in hopes of having a high-paying career...

As contrasted with sweet charming natural lovable stuff, like dozing under your sombrero, eating watermelon while the sun shines, spraying grafitti, smoking dope, sleeping 'till noon....

Posted by: John Weidner at June 2, 2006 09:45 AM

I love the fact that it's considered racist to value individualism over 'collective ideology'.

It's through-the-looking-glass nonsense, part of an increasing tendency on the left to redefine well-understood terms into their opposites by mere assertion. If it's racist to emphasize individual worth over collectivism, then it's no longer necessary for leftists to make moral arguments in favor of 'collective ideology' - they win automatically, by definition.

If they could make cogent arguments for their positions, they wouldn't have to resort to Orwellian tricks.

Posted by: lyle at June 2, 2006 10:32 AM
Weblog by John Weidner