January 21, 2006
A fever is not caused by the disease, but by the Immune Response...
Esko Aho, the former prime minister of Finland, reports to the European Commission in Brussels:
Europe's most successful companies are turning their backs on EU markets because of red tape, a high-level report said yesterday...
...The findings made unsettling reading for the EU leaders, ripping into their pledges to build a "knowledge-based Europe" that would overtake America in 10 years.
The reality was the opposite. Not only were US, Chinese and Japanese firms outspending Europe on research and development, the gap with Europe was growing.
Perhaps most damagingly, Europe's most important countries were pouring more and more of their technology investment overseas, as they despaired of the European Union becoming "innovation friendly"....(Thanks to Betsy N)
What's most important to watch is not the problems--we all got problems--but the response. When people like me say that Europe is dying, it's because we expect no renovatio, no movements of reform and renewal to arise.
There are no grass-roots movements big enough to make changes. No cowboys will be elected, no Reagans, no Bush...not even a Schwarzenegger. There's no "Culture War," no National Review, no AEI, no Rush Limbaughs.
Here in the US we have a competitiveness problem of our own, in the blood-sucking lawsuits that hinder every move we make. BUT, we also have an immune response, with Tort Reform being high on the Republican agenda. (It will be an up-hill battle, with the Democrat Party being a wholly-owned subsidiary of those leeches. But that's one of the reasons Republicans are now in the majority. We are anti-bodies generated by parasitic infections.)
When you are sick, and have a fever, the fever is not caused by the disease, but by your immune system fighting back. I predict the Europe will not be running a temperature as a result of these obvious problems...That's a sign of imminent death.
(I pasted some more of the report below)
...Unless EU governments took bold action to increase spending on research, freed labour markets so skilled workers could move more easily, and stopped pouring taxpayers' money into dying industries, Europe's post-war way of life was doomed....Posted by John Weidner at January 21, 2006 09:39 AM
...His report listed a string of gloomy indicators. In 1992, six out of the 10 top-selling pharmaceuticals were produced by European companies. In 2002, this figure had fallen down to two. European firms invested billions more in the United States than US firms invested in Europe....
...European governments were criticised for continuing to pour state aid into dying industries such as cars, steel and textiles. As part of the so-called Lisbon agenda of 2001 EU leaders committed themselves to spending three per cent of their gross domestic product on research and development.
Halfway through the 10-year Lisbon agenda programme, the EU still spent a meagre 1.9 per cent, far behind the US or Japan....
That's funny, I could have sworn that various liberal economists have been claiming that Europe's state-run health care system makes them more competitive?
Posted by: Lurking Observer at January 21, 2006 12:25 PMAnd Paul Krugman claims France is as productive as the US. I don't know what the equivalent of a two-by-four between the eyes is for the western left, but it better come soon.
Posted by: Frank at January 22, 2006 04:49 AMThe antibodies are there alright, they just don't get much press. There are undercurrents to European politics simply not reported here in our media. I'm not expecting any radical change any time soon, but there are those organizing to work at it. Who knows, with the Internet now available to break the media logjam perhaps they can do it a tad quicker than the 60+ years it took Republicans to get back into power.
Posted by: Deep Keel at January 22, 2006 11:12 PMI do hear of some of those undercurrents now and then...via Internet, not press. But they always look like too-little-too-late to me.
Posted by: John Weidner at January 23, 2006 06:53 AMI agree with you, likely much too little too late. But it is so hard to tell. If you listened to the major US media from afar you would still likely be puzzled at how Republicans won the vote of a majority of the nation. Foreigners certainly would never have seen Reagan coming as a serious, not to mention world changing, candidate for President. Realistically I rate the chances for Europe as very small, but never say never.
I think much depends on events there. All is not sliding one way into hell in Europe, not yet at least. Some European governments are implementing immigration reform that we could only dream of here for instance. The riots in France did not go unnoticed. A reversal of the trend this is not, but it shows a ray of hope. I recommend http://www.brusselsjournal.com as a source for some of these developments covered in English from the Continent, and the heart of the EU at that.
Posted by: Deep Keel at January 23, 2006 07:18 PM
