January 04, 2006
Civilizations die from suicide...
Mark Steyn's piece in OpinionJournal today is a must-read...
...Yet while Islamism is the enemy, it's not what this thing's about. Radical Islam is an opportunistic infection, like AIDS: It's not the HIV that kills you, it's the pneumonia you get when your body's too weak to fight it off...
...That's what the war's about: our lack of civilizational confidence. As a famous Arnold Toynbee quote puts it: "Civilizations die from suicide, not murder"--as can be seen throughout much of "the Western world" right now. The progressive agenda--lavish social welfare, abortion, secularism, multiculturalism--is collectively the real suicide bomb...
...When it comes to forecasting the future, the birthrate is the nearest thing to hard numbers. If only a million babies are born in 2006, it's hard to have two million adults enter the workforce in 2026 (or 2033, or 2037, or whenever they get around to finishing their Anger Management and Queer Studies degrees). And the hard data on babies around the Western world is that they're running out a lot faster than the oil is. "Replacement" fertility rate--i.e., the number you need for merely a stable population, not getting any bigger, not getting any smaller--is 2.1 babies per woman. Some countries are well above that: the global fertility leader, Somalia, is 6.91, Niger 6.83, Afghanistan 6.78, Yemen 6.75. Notice what those nations have in common?
Scroll way down to the bottom of the Hot One Hundred top breeders and you'll eventually find the United States, hovering just at replacement rate with 2.07 births per woman. Ireland is 1.87, New Zealand 1.79, Australia 1.76. But Canada's fertility rate is down to 1.5, well below replacement rate; Germany and Austria are at 1.3, the brink of the death spiral; Russia and Italy are at 1.2; Spain 1.1, about half replacement rate. That's to say, Spain's population is halving every generation. By 2050, Italy's population will have fallen by 22%, Bulgaria's by 36%, Estonia's by 52%. In America, demographic trends suggest that the blue states ought to apply for honorary membership of the EU: In the 2004 election, John Kerry won the 16 with the lowest birthrates; George W. Bush took 25 of the 26 states with the highest. By 2050, there will be 100 million fewer Europeans, 100 million more Americans--and mostly red-state Americans.
As fertility shrivels, societies get older--and Japan and much of Europe are set to get older than any functioning societies have ever been. And we know what comes after old age....
There's a lot more, and I don't have much time to comment (and adding comments to Steyn is a bit presumptuous). But one thing that becomes ever clearer is that my instincts were right, and in spending decades as a grumpy right-winger I've been on the right track--"The progressive agenda--lavish social welfare, abortion, secularism, multiculturalism--is collectively the real suicide bomb..."
Posted by John Weidner at January 4, 2006 07:55 AMYoungest of five. My husband is also the youngest of five. My four siblings, between the kids they have and the one on the way, have created the replacement level for my family, which means the pressure's off for me...
Except my husband's family is falling down on the job, with only five kids among his four sibs, and they're much older so there probably won't be any more.
I am not going to have six kids. We'll see how I feel after my first...
Posted by: B. Durbin at January 4, 2006 10:17 PMSorry, six it is--you have to make up for the people who are into "self-fulfillment."
Actually, I can't imagine considering a life to be one of 'fulfillment" if you haven't tried any risky and difficult things. And for ordinary folks, raising kids is one of the few risky and difficult things you can do.
What an opportunity...
Posted by: John Weidner at January 5, 2006 09:13 AMI'm thinking more along the lines of two or three. The one on the way is by a sister-in-law who had such a difficult first pregnancy, she stated that "if the next one is as bad, we'll stop there."
Which implies planning for at least three. And as they've bought a house with four or five bedrooms, only one of which is to be used as a guest room/office, I'd say a large family is a distinct possibility. (This second pregnancy is proceeding smoothly thus far.)
Me, I'm waiting until we can get a house, because apartment living with small children seems like a bad idea. IOW, I'm hoping the housing crash comes soon, 'cause California houses are so outrageously priced right now... but it is looking like the tech boom in 2000, teetering on the edge...
Posted by: B. Durbin at January 5, 2006 09:03 PMGood luck with the house. My guess is there will be no crash. Which is hard for you, but good for the state... Where do you live?
Posted by: John Weidner at January 5, 2006 10:07 PM
