March 24, 2004
Good questions beget good answers...
Orrin Judd posed a good question regarding this:
The government's former top counterterrorism adviser testified Wednesday that the Clinton administration had "no higher priority" than combatting terrorists while the Bush administration made it "an important issue but not an urgent issue."The question?
Does anyone else find it odd that in his entire run for president, Al Gore never mentioned the most urgent foreign policy issue of the administration he was helping to lead?Somehow I think that Clarke saying that the Clintonites had "no higher priority" than combatting terrorists just isn't going to stick. It won't adhere.
Comments
It could also be that Gore disagreed with Clinton on what the highest priority should be. He acted properly in backing Clinton as VP but they were by no means of one mind on many issues.
Posted by: Kathy K at March 25, 2004 07:21 AMMB doesn't believe the Clinton Administration ever had ANY priorities except self-agrandizement and political gain.
Nor do I.
